portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article oregon & cascadia | portland metro

forest defense | imperialism & war | media criticism

Love in wartime

reflections on life in wartime; feels funny to be using that last word. whew...

Recently, I was hanging out with a new friend from the Eugene peace community and a John Lennon CD started playing in her disc changer. I've been a Lennon fan since I was eight years old, when I first heard "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band", and I knew all the songs we heard by heart, but they were different that night. It was like they were new. "Give Peace a Chance", "Mind Games", and even "Imagine" provided new revelations for me. Why? Because we're in wartime again and that's the climate in which John wrote them originally. For the first time I understood -- intimately -- that emotional space, and I suddenly saw how brave he was to have written, recorded, and released such statements. To be pro-peace in times of war has always been tough, and now, since September 11, John's music resonates more deeply. It is a wonderful experience to have a visceral appreciation for an artist's work, though this was not a way of getting there I would have chosen.

On September 11, my first reaction was, "Oh no, I'm not ready," meaning that I'm new to political activism, and saw in an instant how much more difficult such work was about to become. My mind raced to the horrible consequences that were sure to follow: more carnage abroad, discrimination against minorities at home, and -- most personally -- repression of political activists, a wartime tradition. And sure enough, all three things have come to pass. The U.S. military machine is ruthlessly killing civilians in Afghanistan, at least six minorities have been murdered in this country because of their perceived race, and Congress is passing alarming legislation that's tearing the Fourth Amendment to shreds and which is sure to spread, cancer-like, throughout the rest of the Bill of Rights.

This is a scary time to be alive, to be sure. I won't dwell on that subject, as other posts on this site cover it well. I will also not go too far in depth about how important it is that we stand up to all these injustices, and keep fighting for all the important causes that *aren't* directly related to the damn war; plenty of activists are also keeping this in mind, and putting their thoughts into action. Organizations like the Cascadia Forest Alliance have not laid aside their goals because "the country needs to pull together". Rather, they've stuck with their struggle. And god bless 'em for it; the trees do, after all, still need to be saved.

What I'd like to say here, and this is hardly an original thought, is that "love is the answer". Now before you mutter "stupid hippie" and hit the back key, allow me to clarify.

Che Guevara, the Cuban revolutionary, famously declared: "Let me say, at the risk of seeming ridiculous, that the true revolutionary is guided by great feelings of love." I don't agree with all of Che's tactics -- as a military leader, he was responsible for many deaths -- but I will stand along side him "seeming ridiculous" on this subject.

When we are met with fear, we have two options; fight or flight. Flight is certainly tempting; facing conflicts can be difficult whether they are personal or political. It is easy to rationalize any number of sensible reasons to give up, and we can even make ourselves sound strong when we express them, but flight is nothing more than the abandonment of responsibility. This is not the time to turn our backs on the world.

Our only choice in these hards times is to fight. Not by taking up weapons, but by taking up love. Love is not weak or passive. Love is strength and action -- direct action. In a culture based on selfishness, and under a government bent on violence, to act from love is the bravest thing we can do.

I hate to quote a capitalist, but Franklin Delano Roosevelt was right when he said that "all we have to fear is fear itself." The struggle against U.S. imperialism goes back at least 50 years, and against military and economic colonialism at least 500. So far, those who have stood for peace and justice have not won. We may never win. But the only way we can lose is by giving up, by refusing to fight, by casting aside love. This is our highest calling as humans: to learn to love, especially when it is not easy.

Although the world might indeed have ended on September 11th and been replaced with another, off kilter -- this world is not all bad. Indeed, there are "Beautiful Moments Amidst Madness". The well-regimented forces of hate organizing themselves against us and much of the rest of the world can bring forth the flowering of love, like the "brotherhood of man" that Lennon imagined, or other sweet forms of it. Honestly, this is the only way to survive at this point.

This Empire must reverse its course and become a force for peace. The cycle of violence must end. We must fight for what is right. It's an uphill battle, but there is no other way. We must be "guided by great feelings of love" no matter how ridiculous it might seem.

And that's what I saw and felt on Saturday, November 3, in Salem. Positive energy gathering in the crowd, pushing forward, and flowing out onto the streets. I was there to cover the event to write an Indymedia post, but I was not apart from the people there; I was not separate or objective; the story I wrote about it was not balanced. How could it be any of those "professionally journalistic" things? Here was a group of people standing up to one of the most powerful and insidious propaganda machines ever implemented (the U.S. corporate media, which is happily self-censoring itself so as not to risk losing profits) and taking their message to the streets, in public, to the people, in an attempt to make things better. It was a truly beautiful thing, and I could not be unaffected. Nor did I want to be. The positivity of love that can emerge from the negativity of fear is one of the great miracles of human consciousness and should be cherished, not written off as "subjective" or "soft". To reject love is to reject life itself.

But who is brave enough to make this choice? So far, not very many, even among the "activist community". We must spread the word, share the feeling, nurture the new soft shoots where ever they might spring up. If we want to save the world, that's the path to take, with bravery, strength, and a willingness to fight. The moneychangers have been in the temple long enough; it's time to knock over their tables, throw them out, and make room for real love, real faith, real life.

We need more than love i think. 05.Nov.2001 13:25

anonymous

I think *love* is one of the things that the american resistance movement has enough of. Maybe too much love. Too much love for cops. For murderers. For state terrorists.

I don't see much hope for the movement as long as we march around with signs and going home. In the 60s, the U.S. government sustained years of widespread rioting on the war issue and civil rights issue while killing unprecedented amounts of people.

Is that what we're going to do this time? How long will it take for people to give a fuck in this country?

Yes, but ... 07.Nov.2001 05:54

Dance dancing@theedgeoftheknown.com

while J. Stolen rightly points out that "plenty of activists", such as those in the Cascadia Forest Alliance, "have stuck with their struggle", don't miss the point that the work of the CFA and others is also an example of the need "to pull together" - not behind Bush's war leadership - but with each other and the rest of humanity. As we stand UP TO and AGAINST powerful, destructive forces, we also stand WITH the forces of love and stand FOR the planet as a whole.

We must not direct all our attention and energies to the "war" - supporting or opposing it and its injustices; we can't let the forces of domination control our agenda with their war-making. They can create and manipulate crazy scenarios endlessly; WE MUST NOT ABANDON OUR GOALS TO REACT TO THEIR REAL OR PRETENDED INSANITY. We must stay true to our causes, redoubling our efforts at imagining and making real workable alternatives to the dysfunctional systems that are now in control. We must prepare ourselves and others to "lead" the way, hand-in-hand, to a new society(ies) that will rejoice in, and preserve, this rare, marvelous green globe on which we all live.

And as we oppose "their" war, and stand up to "their" greed and destruction, WE must remember we're doing it out of LOVE. It's up to US to REMEMBER (no matter what may be said about us) that our outrage, our fierceness, our defensiveness, our anger, and our hate come from our love of ourselves, truth, the planet, and even our "enemies". And WE must REVEAL the love that inspires us to confront and fight and struggle. Or we'll risk losing our potential allies and all those we seek to serve and the very world we seek to create.

Perhaps we can redirect our society to nurture the POSITIVE potential of our species. Imagine if we used our uniquely human abilities, such as reason, shared knowledge, and empathy, to preserve the planet rather than to destroy it! As Jeremy wrote, "This is our highest calling as humans: to learn to love, especially when it is not easy."

It's about *real* love 07.Nov.2001 07:21

Barbara

anon - if the reistance truly had enough love, we would not find ourselves here in this place which is opposite of love. The brand of love that you are refering to is not *love* at all but a cheap, scandulous imitation that we are led to believe (be-*lie*-ve) is the real thing.

Whenever restrictions and conditions are placed on *love* one can be sure that it is a saccharinated and generic variety, which true enough, can not begin to heal the wounds of the world.

on love 09.Nov.2001 11:26

marshall aaceugene@hotmail.com

love, love, love... I can't get enough of it, that's for sure. However, I too believe that we need more than love. I have been thinking lately about the way that hate has been stigmatized. Is all hate bad? In fact, I think a fair amount of it is appropriate these days. Haters of life, difference, freedom etc. are more responsible I'd say, for the mess we're in, than simply hate itself.

I went out to the woods recently (a rarity for me) and was reminded of the beauty beyond words of wild nature. The experience was invigorating and inspiring, but it also reaffirmed my hatered for the behaviors that are destroying all life at an unbelievable rate.

Just a few tidbits for perspective: 1.The US economy and projection of power are founded on what the US Senate has found to be $500 billion in drug money laundered each year by the major US banks. (www.narconews.com/petras1.html)
2.the US elite (corporate and state) use torture, deathsquads and Psychological warfare all over the world to bend people to their will. (see, for example, www.colombiareport.org or www.tapol.org re Indonesia)
3.this country was founded on and is maintained by genocide beyond compare.
4.this government is the most powerful in the history of the planet, the only one to ever be able to act anywhere in the world at any time, either in terms of military or economic force. (see www.trilateral.org)

so, I don't think that love alone is going to do it. I think it's past time to contest, disrupt and transform in many different ways-- not all of which will apear to be first and foremost loving.

for further info on what people are up to, see
www.earthliberationfront.org
www.crimethinc.com
www.tao.ca/~ban (the Bioengineering Action Network-a great site!)


to anonymous, and marshall 10.Nov.2001 00:28

the sweet rEvolutionary

Revisit these two sections of Stolen's essay:

"Love is not weak or passive. Love is strength and action -- direct action. In a culture based on selfishness, and under a government bent on violence, to act from love is the bravest thing we can do."

and

"If we want to save the world, that's the path to take, with bravery, strength, and a willingness to fight. The moneychangers have been in the temple long enough; it's time to knock over their tables, throw them out, and make room for real love, real faith, real life."

These are fighting words, and seem purposely vague regarding particular tactics. Though he rejects violence against humans, he otherwise recommends no particular action. Pacifism, with which both your responses seem to take issue, is unmentioned in the piece. In fact, the philosophy above does not, it seems to me, preclude actions taken by ELF and ALF. Perhaps the point he was making is that love makes the best *motivator* of action, leaving the expression of that up to you.